Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Cinematic Universe Official Tie-In Comics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to the respective articles. L Faraone  05:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Marvel Cinematic Universe Official Tie-In Comics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. Perhaps the content should be merged to Marvel Cinematic Universe or the individual films that the comics tie-into. TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - needs a rewrite, but seems to be notable. Uberaccount (talk) 22:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * While there are a few individual sources, there are none that speak to them as a group and as such no analytical comparisons can be made. Therefore there is no reason to group them together in a single standalone article. The content is much better suited in the individual film articles that the comic books tie-into (e.g. The Avengers (2012 film)).--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 2.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  22:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  23:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge as suggested by TriiipleThreat seems reasonable. If more sources are available later, it can always be restored and rebuilt. BOZ (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge as suggested by TriiipleThreat. The only way I could see this surviving on its own is if it were turned into a list article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spidey104 (talk • contribs) 14:43, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.