Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvelous MMW


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Deleted as a CSD G11. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Marvelous MMW

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject fails WP:NMUSIC, sources are self published and don’t meet WP:GNG. A Google search doesn’t provide anything. Xclusivzik (talk) 02:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep still notable BrightjY (talk) 7:51, 24 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete This article was entirely copied from the Simple wikipedia and already Tagged for deletion by RFD.This article seems to be self created article (promotion of this artist)}}  no reliable sources, this is entirely a promotion delete102.23.96.18 (talk) 08:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

(talk) 4:10, September 2021
 * Keep Not copied from simple Wikipedia BrightjY
 * BrightjY, you are welcome to add a further comment in answer to another editor's post after your first comment, but you should give a bold "keep" or "delete" only once. That makes it easy for editors to see at a glance how many people have indicated support for each of those options. JBW (talk) 16:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - not even close to meeting WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO and makes no actual claim to notability Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Simply not notable. An autobiography presumably. Wishing the subject success.  Princess of Ara  19:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Doesn't claim notability. There are no reliable sources about them at all, so fails the general notability guideline. Also note the cross-wiki spam... --Ferien (talk) 21:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Still notable and on webstrian news BrightjY (talk 5:37, 25 September 2021
 * Hi @ you are allowed to make further comments but !voting twice is not allowed. Kindly take note.  Princess of Ara  19:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: article creator now globally locked as a spam-only account. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Delete promotion or spam105.112.106.62 (talk) 08:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete It's more of a promotion adding all his social media profiles as external links plus the topic is not even notable.-Idoghor Melody (talk) 14:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete self promotion - non notable KylieTastic (talk) 18:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Obvious case of G11 (tagged as such) and trout the nominator for wasting everyone's time when this did not require AfD. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.