Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marwa Rakha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Marwa Rakha

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable persion. No real sources mentioned her. Just her ownsite or her blogs. It's requried to provide independent sources about her notable works if exists. But I can see that there is no such sources found for her as no notable works. إسلام (talk) 14:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women,  and Egypt. Shellwood (talk) 18:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:GNG. I also tagged the authors other article "Feras Bugnah". Nswix (talk) 02:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment She is number #1 expert in Montessori education in Egypt, Published more than 4 books in arabic and english. Her facebook page has 196k followers. I think it's hard to call her Not notable. Her work and role in Egypt feminist movement was documented in the book: Women Rising: In and Beyond the Arab Spring by Rita Stephan, Mounira M. Charrad
 * recent interview with her: في عيد الأم.. حوار مع مروة رخا | راحة بالي (rahetbally.com) AhmedNaji1985 (talk) 17:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * More source about her work also here:
 * AP Newsroom
 * HR & Montessori; An Interview with Marwa Rakha - HR Revolution Middle East
 * Insight into Egyptian Relationships - Dipo Tepede
 * مروة رخا (Author of أنا وآدم والمونتيسوري) | Goodreads
 * مروة رخا - Marwa Rakha | Facebook AhmedNaji1985 (talk) 17:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * None of these are enough to establish notability. Its couple interviews, a book review and her Facebook page. Nswix (talk) 23:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO as demonstrated by the above sources. Primary, social media, interviews do not show notability. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).
 *  // Timothy :: talk  08:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.