Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marwan E. Jubran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Marwan E. Jubran

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page is an autobiography (see contribs). The only sources appear to be official credits, rather than any third party reliable sources that would meet WP:BLP or WP:N. Oren0 (talk) 00:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 11:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete as an autobiography of marginal or no notability, with no secondary sources for its main text. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The article has relevant references to unique research of value. I recommend cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.247.36.84 (talk) 09:39, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * User:98.247.36.84 appears to be the subject of this article. Oren0 (talk) 04:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for helping make the article neutral in terms of point of view. I believe Wikipedia pages related to pyrolysis (of waste), landfills (composition), gas separation (Carbon dioxide from Hydrogen sulfide), runoff curve number (determination) should reference the results of the research we have done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejubran (talk • contribs) 08:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Marwan, I just followed the references on some of this research. Of the ones I clicked, I didn't see your name on any of them. Oren0 (talk) 22:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * There are 3 research projects I worked on, designing the systems, doing the experiments and collecting the results.
 * Generation and Composition of Construction and Demolition Waste in Florida,
 * Construction and Testing of a Seepage Meter Test Tank and Testing of Seepage Meters,
 * Use of Phosphogypsum to Biodegrade Municipal Solid Waste,, reference (M. E. Jubran) to my work on phosphogypsum research here and here
 * The reason my name is not on some is the fact that I did not write the publications. The rest of the research I was involved in writing the publications. This includes the patents and pending applications. If you see any other links that my name is not quoted let me know, I can produce evidence. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejubran (talk • contribs) 07:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If your name is not on these articles you can't cite them in your article as evidence of notability. Lots of people have patents and are in the credits of games, neither of these make you a notable subject of an encyclopedia article. Oren0 (talk) 03:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not achieved either by WP:Prof or WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC).
 * Oren0: I removed all the statements in the article that have references where my name is not cited. I pioneered the use of static code analysis on games, which I believe makes me notable. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejubran (talk • contribs) 12:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there a reference that calls you a "pioneer" or is this your own interpretation? All the reference in the article demonstrates is that you gave a talk on static code analysis at a conference. See also: WP:PEACOCK. Oren0 (talk) 00:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Oren0: Adding a reference: http://pkisensee.wordpress.com/page/10/, Quote: "Marwan Jubran is one of the true experts at Microsoft when it comes to code analysis." - please update as you see fit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejubran (talk • contribs)
 * Blogs are not generally considered reliable sources for the purposes of notability, especially in articles about living people. See WP:BLOGS and, more specifically, WP:BLPSPS: "Never use self-published sources – including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets – as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject." (emphasis added) Oren0 (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Removed the entire statement in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejubran (talk • contribs) 09:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete&mdash;If the static code analysis work is going to be the primary claim to notability then I'd expect to see peer-reviewed publications with significant cite counts as well as biographical articles in the gaming literature. If you can add those cites to the article I'll be happy to take another look.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 17:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Lesser: Notability is not only based on the code analysis work I have done, citations are in game credits part of the article (game credits do not highlight the type of work I have done), and the patent granted on code analysis.
 * Others include unique chemical, environmental, civil research work I have done, see publications and citations within the article.
 * Current work I am doing is the datacenter space part of cloud computing and cloud services, highlighted by patents filed and pending. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejubran (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.