Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Althaus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Delete Mandsford 22:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Mary Althaus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to verify the contents of the article and sufficiently assess notability. Hosting a Japanese language television course does not rise to the level of notability required for inclusion. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. J04n(talk page) 21:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 21:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 21:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 21:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria, much less WP:GNG. Happy Editing! &mdash;  02:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no reliable independent sources which would indicate that she meets the criteria for inclusion --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 12:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think nom pegs it correctly. Even if a source were found to confirm some of the basics, the main claim of notability seems to rest on being the host of a tele-course – this is a country mile short of notability. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC).
 * Speedy Delete. Not even close to being notable.  68.45.109.14 (talk) 16:53, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V --> doesn't belong here. Alzarian16 (talk) 09:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There look to be a few relevant hits on google scholar, but none are remotely well-cited. Otherwise, not finding anything at all.  Sailsbystars (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.