Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ann Block


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 06:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Mary Ann Block

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

a completely or near-completely unsourced biography which does not establish notability of the subject. BE——Critical __Talk 16:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment - This article smells like POV smuggling... "Scientologists and others..." Carrite (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - "self-published author" etc. Violates WP:SOAP. Bearian (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Bluewave (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Full of unsourced hype. Not notable as an author, no reliable coverage found of her or her books. Not notable as a physician or expert; she has absolutely zero publicaations at Google Scholar or PubMed, apparently has never published in a peer-reviewed journal. No sources given except a few worthless, unexplained notes like "(Rapp 2003; Wills-Brandon 2000)." --MelanieN (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per first line of the article "Mary Ann Block..is a self-published author", not notable. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.