Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Anne Feeney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. Of note is that managers/senior managers of organizations and companies do not have presumed notability on English Wikipedia based upon their professional status. North America1000 02:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Mary Anne Feeney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability. Qwirkle (talk) 13:18, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. –  numbermaniac  13:31, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. –  numbermaniac  13:31, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 13:31, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. –  numbermaniac  13:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. –  numbermaniac  13:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * She is Senior Director of External Relations at the International Peace Institute (IPI) and thus notable. Please keep. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge - with International Peace Institute - not enough RS coverage to warrant own article. Possible WP:TOOSOON. Netherzone (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * What’s to merge, beyond a name and a job title? Qwirkle (talk) 15:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There is a section in the IPI article called "Notable individuals" - not all the people listed there have their own article. It seems given Feeney's track record that she would qualify. Netherzone (talk) 15:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a better approach would be to remove them too, or at least describe them differently, since in Wiki’s peculiar vocabulary they are not notable. Qwirkle (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Despite the single word nomination without any rationale for deletion. This person does not seem to meet the inclusion threshold. I have found no further sourcing to support anything over the current sources in the article which are a primary source and a business listing about the charity, not the subject at hand. I don't believe even her position is even notable enough to make a mention in the International Peace Institute article. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The sourcing simply doesn't establish GNG and simply being the executive director of an NGO/Peace institute does not establish notability either. I agree with Qwirkle that we should probably remove the "notable individuals" without articles on the IPI article as well. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete an event planner for a minor NGO who lacks a claim to notability and lacks sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.