Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Augustine Lane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Mary Augustine Lane

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which provide significant coverage of this nun, writer and activist. Attempted a variety of web/news/books searches but it's of course possible I've missed something through name variation or through non-online sources. joe deckertalk to me 18:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG, no reliable independent sources to support notability. WWGB (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is almost a candidate for speedy deletion - as no claim to notability is made. StAnselm (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails the GNG, and in my opinion is only barely ineligible for A7. -- Lear's Fool 20:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete* Page created by a user who creates many religious people pages which get deleted. User talk:O'Donoghue Ray-Rays 01:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.