Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Chun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Mary Chun

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, secondary non-trivial support. References are primarily single-line mentions. A local award and a local nomination may not be enough to establish notability. red dogsix (talk) 19:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - I respect the opinion presented here, though I disagree. Within the classical music world, Avanti ensemble, Earplay, and the classical music establishments of San Francisco are all very prominent. The awards listed are important in cities like New York and San Francisco.  They set standards for the rest of the country.  The article in the San Francisco Classical Voice is a full-length article about the subject, by a noted classical music critic of the San Francisco Examiner and the San Jose Mercury News. As a final thought, the very fact that Chun holds such positions of leadership as opera/orchestra conductor, in an industry utterly dominated by men is a testament to her importance. The sheer number of references to Chun in major news sources is significant User:HexaKord415 (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per HexaKord415's arguments. Her conducting has been widely reported in reputable newspapers and journals. She's leading two notable organisations. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bobherry  Talk   Edits  14:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources exist from Hawaii to eastern Europe, and with WP:GNG, sources may be entirely local anyway.  Unscintillating (talk) 21:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.