Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ellis of New Brunswick

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to delete the article. --Canderson7 16:05, September 5, 2005 (UTC)

Mary Ellis of New Brunswick
Article does not explain what makes this person notable. That she's buried in a parking lot? That she may have inspired a song (though there is no substantiation for that allegation, and even that is hardly notable)? Zoe 07:28, August 27, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom Ryan Norton T 08:19, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep only if the local lore can be more fully documented and established in an encyclopaedic way. But delete the death order/birth order type deal; it's rather unnecessary. (unsigned vote from Paul Klenk)
 * Delete A grave in a parking lot might make a brief footnote in local travel guides, but it isn't really the sort of thing that gets an encyclopedia article. The main claim of notability (about the song) is totally unverified, and seems like quite a stretch at best anyway.  I'd also like to note that of the three ext links in the article, two don't work (404'ed) and the last gives no real info. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  13:32, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Dottore So 14:51, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to New Brunswick, New Jersey or Weird NJ Roodog2k 15:03, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep factual and verifiable. Trollderella 22:03, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Andrew Lenahan Denni &#9775; 01:10, 2005 August 28 (UTC)
 * Delete per Starblind. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 19:03, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Roodog; also, find more substantive evidence; otherwise, delete.  &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 02:42, 30 August 2005 (UTC) I would recommend putting the entry under one's user page.    &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 02:42, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Interesting, but not encyclopedic.  Claims lack high quality sources.  Quale 15:22, 31 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.