Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ewen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | communicate _ 23:28, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Mary Ewen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails WP:N's coverage of requirement of non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent third-party sources. Most of the references that I could locate were either trivial references or obituaries, neither of which suggest meeting WP:N's requirement of making "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". Anything verifiable from this article is already at longevity claims and there's no evidence of sufficient notability/information to justify a stand-alone article. Canadian  Paul  01:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Only one valid source. Notability hangs on the longevity claim, which is disputed, and covered in another article DavidTTTaylor (talk) 14:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 18:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I wasn't able to find additional sources, tried the usual plus Highbeam Research.  I don't see this reaching WP:GNG.  --j⚛e deckertalk 21:26, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.