Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Guiney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) -- VersaceSpace  🌃 04:52, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Mary Guiney

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

All listed sources seem to be, not in-depth coverage about the subject. Googling the subject does not seem to bring up much better sources. I does not seem to pass WP:NCORP. Kitrsjlhf 
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 2.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 01:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women,  and Ireland.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not sure what "Googling" was undertaken as part of WP:BEFORE, but the nom appears to have missed the subject's extended biography in the Dictionary of Irish Biography and other extended coverage in other biographical and national news sources (of which the subject is the primary topic). Which contribute to SIGCOV, even if we discount any number of various obits). The DIB entry alone swings it for me. As meeting criteria 3 of WP:ANYBIO ("has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionary"). Mine is a very firm "keep" recommendation. Guliolopez (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Guliolopez. Passes WP:ANYBIO and sigcov is there. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 12:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Guliolopez, etc. Easily passes WP:ANYBIO and WP:SIGCOV, including national bio. dictionary. One of the most famous Irish business figures of her time, and still well-known now. Online searches alone show much, and in addition, given time period, more in offline and closed archive sources. I suggest a swift end to this nom., perhaps withdraw? SeoR (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2022 (UTC) The relevance of NCORP is also unclear - this applies to multi-person entities ("an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose.") and neither individuals nor even families. SeoR (talk) 00:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Clearly notable. National biographical dictionary for a start, then the obits in major national newspapers. Pam  D  07:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Not sure why WP:NCORP was mentioned, as she was a person, not a company. Pam  D  07:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep There is no need to pass WP:NCORP, subject passes WP:ANYBIO and WP:SIGCOV. —Natalie  Ricci Natalie 20:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.