Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Jackson (Stephen King)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 12:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Mary Jackson (Stephen King)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I was tempted to speedy this myself, but as this character has appeared in two books and a TV movie, I thought it might be best to bring it here. There's no assertion of notability here, and no references outside of links to the articles we have about the books she appears in. AniMate talk  00:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following for deletion:


 * Both are characters from the same novels, and neither asserts any notability. AniMate  talk  00:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Both are characters from the same novels, and neither asserts any notability. AniMate  talk  00:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Both are characters from the same novels, and neither asserts any notability. AniMate  talk  00:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  04:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  04:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly minor characters, no reason for inclusion provided, notability guidelines not met. - Mgm|(talk) 10:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet inclusion criteria. Karanacs (talk) 15:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN trivial character. Cheers, Jack Merridew 04:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No attempt to establish notability, no sources and nothing to suggest the article contains more than trivia which, granted, may be of interest to a fan, but I don;t think it has a place in an encyclopaedia. HJ Mitchell   Articulate  10:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.