Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary K. Estes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Mary K. Estes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PROF but still consensus needed.   Mr RD     18:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I do not agree. Dr. Estes is a fellow of both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. These honors are extremely prestigious and indicate that Dr. Estes has made a significant impact on multiple fields of science. In addition, more information on publications and impact are being added to the article. S L Seston (talk) 22:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  22:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong keep per SL Seston. Estes being a member of the IOM and NAS is enough to meet WP:PROF, as is the fact that she is the editor-in-chief of Current Opinion in Virology, a respected journal with an impact factor. Everymorning   talk  22:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. Nominator should consider withdrawing this ill-advised nomination. We're not ever going to delete an article on a national academy member as being insufficiently notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow keep per the above. I added references to the AAAS and NAS designations. EricEnfermero (Talk) 23:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.