Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary MacIsaac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and then redirect to List of Canadian supercentenarians. North America1000 19:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Mary MacIsaac

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clear failure of WP:GNG as a 108th birthday report and two obituaries that go to the same website (one is now a dead link) does not make a person notable. There is nothing of interest in this article that isn't already mentioned in List of Canadian supercentenarians. Per the guidelines at the WP:WOP and WP:NOPAGE, this article belongs on a list and not a standalone article. CommanderLinx (talk) 03:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Note to closing admin the IP address who restored this article from a redirect was blocked for ban evasion. CommanderLinx (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Please note User:CommanderLinx has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia over his role in these nominations and forcing redirects without discussion. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Nope. Play nice Mr Norton. CommanderLinx (talk) 02:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. Was the Commander indefinitely blocked for some period of time? If not, was this a good-faith error?  To the uninitiated, this looks like a bad faith allegation, but maybe I'm just not in on the joke. RAN, what's this about? David in DC (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Here was the block notice on his page up when I wrote what I wrote. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * A misteak on my behalf. An anonymous IP address added the notice back in January and I didn't realise until another editor pointed it out to me a few days ago. Not his fault, I should have noticed it earlier. CommanderLinx (talk) 03:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep the coverage runs from her becoming the oldest person living and an obituary when they died. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Coverage is a 108th birthday report and two obituaries that lead to the same website. No significant coverage here. CommanderLinx (talk) 02:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This is not the guiness book of world records, so we do not keep articles for mere trivia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, then redirect There's nothing here to justify a stand-alone article. The nominator's citation to the NOPAGE essay and to PERMASTUB are right on target. We lose nothing by redirecting this to the list of Canadians suggested in the nomination. That's the result that the guidance at the World's Oldest People wikiproject page would lead us to and that's where we should go. David in DC (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Isn't it Wikipedia policy to keep all super-centenarians?. What is the cutoff on age? Freda Martial (talk) 21:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * There is nothing in the notability guidelines that says "living to age X makes you notable". CommanderLinx (talk) 03:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete/redirect" per WP:NOPAGE. "The Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan commemorated her death" is the most interesting part.  E Eng ''' 14:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to List of Canadian supercentenarians. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete/redirect. WP:NOPAGE, WP:PERMASTUB, WP:ROUTINE coverage of human interest stories. ~ RobTalk 18:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.