Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Remmy Njoku (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 23:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Mary Remmy Njoku
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability. The sources provided are unreliable and majority of the sources are self-published material with no credible editorial oversight. Ref 1 is the official website of her husband and ref 2 does not mention her at all. Ref 3 is a passing mention and the source is about the film titled "Thy Will Be Done". Ref 4 is a picture and a passing mention of her. Ref 5 is a blog and not in anyway close to a reliable source. Ref 6 is a passing mention and ref 7 is a blog. Ref 8 is Istagram and ref 9 is a passing mention. Ref 10 and ref 11 are blogs. Ref 12 mention the birth of her baby boy and nothing more. However, the ones are found through WP:BEFORE doesn't make a difference. The truth is that Wikipedia is not a place for every actor and actress that feature in movies. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - This currently suggests it's unlikely better satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  08:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm going to have to agree on this one. Simply not enough in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG, and they clearly don't pass WP:NACTOR.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.