Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Rose School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 02:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Mary Rose School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This School Is Not Notable Enough. There is Over 180 diffrent "sports colleges" and many schools for special needs through out the world. Also the Section on Uniform's Realy Spells out the Purpose of this Article. Its Not Ment to Be Encyclopedic. CelesJalee (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. Michellecrisp (talk) 05:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Meets WP:V and WP:NOTE. --Gene_poole (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * How does it meet WP:NOTE? Michellecrisp (talk) 06:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - contains a high school and there are sufficient sources available, though not in the page, to meet WP:N including controversy over delays in its opening. This school was independently assessed to have an outstanding sixth form and is the only special school, as far as I am aware, to either be a specialist sports college or to have an outstanding sixth form. Such pages should be expanded and not deleted. TerriersFan (talk) 02:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —TerriersFan (talk) 02:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Alberta
 * Keep There are adequate independent, reliable sources to write a WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR article. Double Blue  (Talk) 14:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Aren't secondary schools usually held to be notable if enough reliable sources can be found to write an article? Random  89  16:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: That's certainly the consensus that's evolved over the past half decade. --Gene_poole (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Above and beyond the strong consensus and precedent regarding the notability of secondary schools, the reliable and verifiable sources provided in the article support the claim of notability. Alansohn (talk) 21:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The article does not have a section on uniforms and so must now be encyclopedic. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * keep it looks to me like this is a high school, which we normally keep--but even if it isn't, there are some good sources for this short artilce and it still would be a keep.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.