Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary and Robbs Westwood Cafe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 00:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Mary and Robbs Westwood Cafe

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cafe lacks in-depth coverage in non-local and reliable sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DreamRimmer (talk) 01:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: while the dailybruin article includes an interview in-part; most of the article documents the cafe and amounts to SIGCOV.
 * There is no indication that dailybruin is not a reliable source. The fact that a source is local is not an issue. Jack4576 (talk) 01:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - This cafe set some kind of longevity record by operating in the UCLA neighborhood for 83 years. The KCET source is a pubic broadcasting TV channel in Southern California, and gives an informative write-up about how the cafe has evolved from the 1950s era one-counter soda shop in a drug store, to a full restaurant today. — Maile (talk) 03:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Food and drink,  and California.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep meets our guidelines for inclusion. There is no requirement that I am aware of in WP:RS for non-local. Lightburst (talk) 20:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not the most delightful to read article about a diner-type restaurant ever (it could use some TLC drawing on sources already included), but sourced and notable topic. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 16:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.