Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary fisher, dumbarton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Mary fisher, dumbarton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 04:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete:A small development of recent new houses. West Dunbartonshire Council website does not distinguish this as an area, the only mention being that their mobile library has one stop in Mary Fisher Crescent. I see Mary Fisher has been added to Dumbarton which seems sufficient, possibly even undue attention. Arguably a redirect could be added (after standard capitalisation), but I don't see notability. AllyD (talk) 07:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per . The article is unsourced. I couldn't find anything to indicate that this area is specifically recognised in any official capacity. I couldn't find anything in reliable sources to suggest that this collection of buildings is notable for any reason, so it isn't notable when judged according to WP:NGEO. There was a ship named MV Mary Fisher built in 1964, but I couldn't find anything to verify the claims of the area taking its name from this vessel. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: unsourced, can't find any evidence of notability -- The Anome (talk) 22:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.