Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryam Sachs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No discussion after nearly a month. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter  (speak)  @ 10:23, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Maryam Sachs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After searching for sources with which to clean this article up (the original was something of a disaster), I find that the only thing I can verify about this person is that she has written some books and knows Princess Caroline of Monaco. Nothing really notable here. None of her books appear to have garnered any attention, except The Wild Emperor, which appears to have been noticed because of her husband Rolf's involvement. (WP:NOTINHERITED applies here.) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Question. I'm not finding much out there other than some tabloid gossip. There are a few articles that mention her book, but it's almost always trivial in mention at best. I'm thinking that we could probably create a subsection in her husband's article and maybe mention her there? Nothing big, just mention that he's married to her, that she's an author, and that they published a photobook together. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   01:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yikes, her husband's article is sort of a mess. It needs massive cleanup for so many reasons I'm not even sure which one to list first.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   01:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 15:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:48, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 04:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 01:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.