Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryam Tarami


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:41, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Maryam Tarami

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is a shortfilm actress with trivial coverage, limited to two/three urls. Deep significant secondary sources are lacking. Doesn't meet the first rule of WP:ENT. No notable roles in notable movies. Notability not established, fails GNG. HM Wilburt (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. My apologies, . I should not have removed the prod. When I did so, I thought I had found some new WP:RS... However, after this edit, I learned it was not the case. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 00:05, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:44, 24 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nom and . I also tried to find some proper RS on GNG but could get nothing of substance.  Certainly zero WP:SIGCOV, or other major article/book/section of book of which she is the main subject.  Don't like situations where a WP BLP is effectively the main GNG on a subject (it should be the other way around). Simply WP:TOOSOON I'm afraid. Britishfinance (talk) 11:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't source it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.