Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marysia Nikitiuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Marysia Nikitiuk

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fourth-best Ukrainian film of the 2010s by MovieWeb. The person Does not meet our WP:GNG requirements as a WP:FILMMAKER Bruxton (talk) 02:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bruxton (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Not sure what the deletion argument is regarding that first sentence, as the article has far more references and discussion of the subject's work than just the MovieWeb link. There's also the Cannes film awards that exist out there, among others. And there's a lot of non-English coverage out there on her (not exactly surprising) spanning years. Here's just some examples:
 * There's more sources to go through, but I think that's enough to show GNG requirements. Silver  seren C 03:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There's more sources to go through, but I think that's enough to show GNG requirements. Silver  seren C 03:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There's more sources to go through, but I think that's enough to show GNG requirements. Silver  seren C 03:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There's more sources to go through, but I think that's enough to show GNG requirements. Silver  seren C 03:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There's more sources to go through, but I think that's enough to show GNG requirements. Silver  seren C 03:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There's more sources to go through, but I think that's enough to show GNG requirements. Silver  seren C 03:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 *  Keep This editor marked this article for deletion previously. Myself and others have added even more references since then. Her films have been in major film festivals and covered in notable publications. Not sure what the issue is.
 * EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 04:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. The entry has coverage of her work in six languages and I haven’t even touched the search results for her name in Cyrillic (Марисі Нікітюк, if anyone wants to dive in). There’s plenty here. Also I’d be remiss if I didn’t express the consternation I feel at the first sentence’s implication that being one of the best filmmakers of the century in a given country is a demerit if that country is Ukraine. Wikipedia is a global project. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Started in on more of the results in Ukrainian. Innisfree987 (talk) 05:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - sufficient evidence that the subject meets at least 4c in WP:Filmmaker - "(c) won significant critical attention" Lajmmoore (talk) 06:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - now more than passes GNG. --Tagishsimon (talk) 07:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 09:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I see that interviews have been posted here as sources, and an award for - Best Script from Central and Eastern Europe. The collection does not rise to meet our guidelines for WP:FILMMAKER from my reading. We have interviews and awards that are not very notable. Bruxton (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Are you making that assessment just based on the above links? They are only four of currently 33 sources cited in the entry, among which are many fully secondary sources, like news writeups (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and film reviews (6, 7, 8), among other secondary sources, like seven different write-ups of best Ukrainian films, which recognize two of her projects. Moreover, this is not an exhaustive list, just where I’ve paused in the google results for now. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep By a Gnews shows, , , , , , sufficient to pass WP:BASIC. Nassimela (talk) 21:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.