Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masanjia Labor Camp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep  Cena rium  Talk  23:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Masanjia Labor Camp

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable, content fork, mostly non-independent sources being used here. Useful content should be incorporated to Persecution of Falun Gong--Asdfg12345 07:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This camp seems to have plenty of in depth secondary coverage by reliable sources, the core criteria of WP:NOTABILITY. --Oakshade (talk) 15:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't believe any of those are in-depth on Masanjia, and its particular practices. They seem to mention it in passing in context of the wider persecution. Don't you think? And they just repeat the same couple of lines, that it's a place where the practitioners are tortured. I just don't think the article can have more than a couple of lines, about how it's a place where Falun Gong practitioners are tortured. It's no big deal, I guess. --Asdfg12345 07:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep so the nominator of the article wants it kept now? If the nominator doesn't want it deleted then it seems rather pointless having it up for deletion. Nick mallory (talk) 13:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? I nominated it for deletion because I don't think it warrants an article. I don't think it's notable enough. Sorry if my previous comments were unclear. I don't think this labor camp is notable enough to warrant an article; I think it should be deleted, and relevant content (which isn't a great deal) moved to the persecution of Falun Gong page. Why are you voting keep?--Asdfg12345 13:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Suspect Bad Faith Nom. After lenghty experience with DE, POV, by editor Asdfg12345 can no longer Assume Good Faith. Just look at Asdfg12345's edit hostory and edit wars he has intigated/coordinated around the Falun Gong-related articles. Simple facts like Epoch Times is affiliated with Falun Gong, and Qubec Supreme Court Justice declaring Falun Gong controversial - all backed up with Notable sources - somehow get blanked and hacked up. This is a real shame, and demonstrates why wikipedia is a joke. Bobby fletcher (talk) 21:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.