Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masato Funaki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Masato Funaki

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Declined PROD. Notability. No reliable, secondary sources (etc.) on which to establish the notability of this voice actor under WP:GNG. Article has been tagged as an unsourced BLP since 2008, save for a brief period when that tag was removed after the PROD. j &#9883; e decker talk  18:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 18:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Only one of his roles, Genji Ronoue in Umineko no Naku Koro ni, has any real significance. The rest are minor roles that last for just an episode, maybe two. Even if the roles can be sourced, it will still fail WP:NACTOR. —Farix (t &#124; c) 19:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Question (not an opinion, just a question)-- is that role significant/unique enough you'd suggest making a redirect to Umineko no Naku Koro ni rather than delete? -- j &#9883; e decker  talk  19:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see the relevance or usefulness of a redirect from an actor to a television series. —Farix (t &#124; c) 19:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually X5 from Atomic Betty was an important character who was in most if not all the episodes. It may not be enough but that character was not a one or two episode character.--76.66.180.54 (talk) 02:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable for his work. You don't get chosen for that many notable things, from anime to video games, if you weren't considered a capable and notable person by the industry.   D r e a m Focus  20:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There is only one potentially significant role in his entirely body of work. The rest are minor or background characters. One doesn't become notable for being an extra in a lot of things. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't appear to meet minimum inclusions guidelines in terms of body of work and availability of secondary sources. -- Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 06:09, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No third-party sourcing or indication that any of the roles are sufficient to establish notability. --DAJF (talk) 09:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.