Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masaya Sato (footballer, born 1989)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural keep. There is a consensus that the notability of these individuals must be discussed individually. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  10:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Masaya Sato (footballer, born 1989)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is essentially the same case as Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only these footballers played 3 or 4 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 50 AFD discussions (accessible through the AFD link above) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. And mind you, I declined to nominate the players with 6 or 7 league games for deletion.

I am also nominating:
 * Geschichte (talk) 08:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  08:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  08:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  08:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  08:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep Football players should be individually assessed and not grouped. Govvy (talk) 12:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all none of these sports players comes even close to meeting inclusion guidelines. Group nominations are perfectly acceptable in such cases and we should stop allowing proceduralism to weigh down Wikipedia with unneeded articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep - agree with Govvy, in cases where the argument is whether GNG is met or not, there should be individual consideration, otherwise the discussion will turn into a mess. GiantSnowman 18:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep with no prejudice against relisting separately. In a case where we are looking to delete BLPs that technically pass NFOOTY, I think separate discussions for each individual is the only way forward  Spiderone  16:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep These should be nominated individually, if at all. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 23:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.