Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masculinism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. 4 deletes, 4 redirects. I'll redirect it. dbenbenn | talk 04:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Masculinism
Note: This VfD has been vandalized numerous times by Cityhuntr, author of the article, who has also been vandalizing Votes for deletion/Choirboy.

Neologism which admits that it's not popular but has been discussed on "The Paul Show", whatever that is. -- Antaeus Feldspar 08:21, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. TheCoffee 09:29, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Egil 09:45, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, Google yields some 8520 hits on this term. Some of this appears to be appropriate use of it aswell. Inter 10:33, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment to above comment: The article says The first ever discussion of Masculinism occured on The Paul Show. Masculinism per se may need an article, but this particular article is just nonsense by a vandal. -- Egil 11:04, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * redirect to Masculism as reasonable misspelling. As it is this is just a neologism for which there is already a word anyway (misogyny). Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  13:55, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed -- redirect. --FOo 17:52, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Masculism, I concur, can be a reasonable misspelling. As for the article itself, it's probably neologism. Zzyzx11 23:00, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Masculism. Megan1967 23:01, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, then redirect. Rossami (talk) 23:46, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.