Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MashON


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete (the article was speedy deleted as per A7).

MashON

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Thinly disguised advert for website at www.mashon.com. No Google hits. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk)  00:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete The topic in question has no notability. In fact, the website is basically a store for a personal comic book creator. The website is still in beta. It is estimated that the website is viewed only four times a day. The user who created this page seems to have only made an account to make this page (assumption though since user is new). The user who created the page is currently the only contributor and the page does seem to be an advertisement for the website. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 00:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Since the page is simply not notable, I tagged the page for speedy deletion since the article does not need to suffer a process that could last days when it falls under the criteria to be deleted immediately. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 01:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - This article is almost entirely about mashups. It certainly doesn't make any claim for the notability of MashON either as a "call to action" or as a website.  --Hyperbole (talk) 00:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. A non-notable neologism, a non-notable website and a load of blather about the significance of mashups in general, which are already covered under their own articles, but which does not address the notability of this specific subject. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, mashups are notable, but this "MashON" is not. No sources attesting to the notability of the site, etc etc.  Very badly disguised spam, in my opinion.  Lankiveil (complaints 01:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.