Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masha Novoselova (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No further discussion after two relists and the first AFD closed as Keep, so a soft delete seems inappropriate. RL0919 (talk) 04:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Masha Novoselova
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article’s first deletion nomination was clearly poorly done, yet the notability issue still stands (take all the ridiculous puff and promotion out and you will see it). Meanwhile, the fallacious belief that the defunct, obsolete New York Magazine model directory doesn’t. None of these citations do. The Fashion Spot forums?! Unacceptable. Trillfendi (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment. Her work is featured in the book The Magic of Fashion: Ritual, Commodity, Glamour by Brian Moeran, Routledge, 2016 (see here on google books); Harper's Bazaar Fabulous at Every Age: Your Quick & Easy Guide to Fashion By Nandini D'Souza, Jenny Barnett, Sterling Publishing Company, Inc., 2009 (see here in Google Books). Not sure if this lends any notability beyond what's in the article.4meter4 (talk) 20:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Oxon Alex    - talk  09:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Given comment here I can't find my way to close as soft delete, but a nomination only is not a consensus to delete. Relisting in hopes that broader involvement might more firmly establish consensus (or no consensus).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.