Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashdot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 01:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Mashdot
Non-notable website. (A SlashClone :) Alexa rank of 3,500,000. Google rank of 0. Delete &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 23:29Z 
 * Delete, informal writing style, just sounds like a plug. --Liface 23:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, informal writing style, just sounds like a plug. --Liface 23:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, informal writing style, just sounds like a plug. --Liface 23:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, informal writing style, just sounds like a plug. --Liface 23:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Light delete. Mashdot is an example of a trend, or evidence of a trend, that is notable - but is not in itself notable. The author(s) of this article would do better to go and improve the general articles on Journal club or Evidence-based medicine. Hugh2414 08:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as pressing the no. 1 spam button, starts with the site name as a weblink. Further investigation reveals little of note. Sorry, chaps, good idea, but not yet over the threshold.  Comment above is sound, more input on medical subjects is always needed, but please remember not to linkspam. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 20:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 40 Google hits. Johnleemk | Talk 07:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.