Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashirima Kapombe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Mashirima Kapombe

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a journalist, not properly referenced as having a strong claim to passing inclusion criteria for journalists. As always, journalists are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to show markers of significance such as noteworthy journalism awards, coverage and analysis about the significance of their work in sources other than their own employers, and on and so forth -- but this, as written, is of the "journalist who exists" variety, and is referenced entirely to primary source staff profiles and unreliable "career, marriage, education & net worth" sources that aren't support for notability, with absolutely no WP:GNG-worthy sourcing shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Kenya. Bearcat (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Television.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  17:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clearly fails WP:GNG and speaking from a reliability viewpoint, the sources used are utterly unreliable. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.