Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashrafenama (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Mashrafenama (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG & WP:NBOOK (all of criteria). Fails WP:RS, third source is about book selling (promotional report, this source literally says "The online distributor of the book is Rockmarie.com .... Call this number for home delivery..") & then all of source are from book selling site. Also book author doesn't have his own article (non notable author). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 02:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Priyo Bangladeshi verified news website published that this book was published in  Ekushey Book Fair then this is yet not notable?? And this book about Mashrafe Mortaza.you can not write any book about him without his permission. So this is enough notable. For author notability concern, tell any bengali admin that create a article about him. He is a writter and enough source have on internet to write a article about author. And for the promotional site you talking go and check many of notable writter article have this site. And rokomari is a book library you can also read the demo of the book. There have many articles which is unsourced/without source/poorly source, Pleas remove first! Don’t finish my interest to wirte articles next time. Thanks, your decision whatever you do -Rasi56 (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC) sock -- D Big X ray ᗙ  14:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Every year thousand books published in Ekushey Book Fair, so it's not enough for notability. This book “got zero significant coverage”. This book has no review from reliable and independent third party source. Priyo may be verified news website but one "promotional" source doesn't prove notability. I already mentioned that this source literally says "The online distributor of the book is Rockmarie.com .... Call this number for home delivery to get this book..."). It fails WP:SIGCOV. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

I haven’t any relationship but I knew cricket well and interested to work on Bangladeshi cricketers articles but currently more focus on Mashrafe's article. I want to create all missing things. I wanted to create shakib al hasan man of the match award but it already someone created before. I hope you get your question answer brother. -Rasi56 (talk) 18:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC) brother talking about promotional, there have thousand of article in wikipedia and news in verifed website about artist,sports person general person who are not enough famous! they are pay to news website to make news about them and get a place in wikipedia.that time no one concern about promotional just saw the news site is from a verified site or news about him just give a place in wikipedia, there have hundred of articles poorly sourced,unsourced but no one bother! - Rasi56 (talk) 18:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC) disagree, there have thousand of book publish but not all book published in verified website if the writter is not notable enoughRasi56 (talk) 08:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete- It fails all notability guidelines that cover book including the general notability guidelines. I would also request Rasi56 to declare any relations with Mashrafe Mortaza,nearly all their edits are about Mashrafe Mortaza.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG, proof of existence, publishing details (even by a notable/reputable publisher), press releases/announcements are not enough, what is needed (amongst other things) are reviews from independent sources, in this case, these do not appear to be available. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.