Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashrafer Shonge Cricket Anonde (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Mashrafer Shonge Cricket Anonde (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG & WP:NBOOK (all of criteria). Fails WP:RS, first & third source are about book selling (promotional report) & then all of source are from book selling site. Also book author doesn't have his own article (non notable author). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 02:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 02:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Bdnews24.com Bangladeshi verified news website published that this book was published in  Ekushey Book Fair then this is yet not notable?? And this book about Mashrafe Mortaza.you can not write any book about him without his permission. So this is enough notable. For author notability concern, tell any bengali admin that create a article about him. He is a writter and enough source have on internet to write a article about author. And for the promotional site you talking go and check many of notable writter article have this site. And rokomari is a book library you can also read the demo of the book. There have many articles which is unsourced/without source/poorly source, Pleas remove first! Don’t finish my interest to wirte articles next time. Thanks, your decision whatever you do -Rasi56 (talk) 06:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Every year thousand books published in Ekushey Book Fair, so it's not enough for notability. This book “got zero significant coverage”. This book has no review from reliable and independent third party source. Those sources you mention may be verified news website but in this case the sources are "promotional/press release" type. Those sources literally gives you book price, address of book stall for buying. It fails WP:SIGCOV. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

* Delete As per WP:NBOOK, proof of publishing or sale is not enough to demonstrate that a book is notable: it needs multiple significant works describing it. I'm not sure how reliable bdnews24 is, but the single usable reference listed is a simple, three paragraph review as part of a larger article. Being part of a large book fair or being about a notable subject is no indication of notability of the book itself. Spike &#39;em (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC) bdnews24 gov approved verified news portal and this book is notable I disscuss above, look at my comment Rasi56 (talk) 22:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC) sock-- D Big X ray ᗙ  13:24, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter if it gov approved site or not. I already said bdnews24 may be good news site but problem the sources used in this article aren't Independent & Significant coverage. It's clearly "promotional/press release" type news, Those sources literally gives you book price, address of book stall for buying. Anything about mashrafe aren't automatically notable. Otherwise according to your logic i can create other two books listed in that press/promotional news. Please don't repeat same thing again, i also don't want to. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

*Delete not notable enough. Hafiz ansi (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC) sock-- D Big X ray ᗙ  13:24, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I will have to agree with the nominator on this one. I looked at the source and it looks blatantly promotional. After assessing it's quality, I doubt that it's independent. The subject does have some coverage in this source, but it's useless if it's not independent. Apart form this source, I couldn't find significant coverage anywhere. That said, even if it was reliable and independent, one source wouldn't be enough to establish notability. Masum Reza 📞 07:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - simply not a notable enough book to pass NBOOK. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete the fact that we can verify that this book exists, and the fact that the person that the book is about is notable, are beside the point. Notability is not inherited. The book itself fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG as noted by the nominator. Google searches reveal nothing to suggest that the book itself is notable. Harrias  talk 08:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.