Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashuru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   06:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Mashuru

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

article never cited any sources and is not notable as is. Wasabi,the,one (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The concept of notability applies to the subjects of articles, not to the articles themselves, and in particular not to articles "as is". What reason do you have to think that the subject of this article is not notable per WP:GEOLAND? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There were a large number of scholarly sources to be found, a few of which described the division in detail and can be used to fill out the article. When I looked at which other Kenyan divisions have their own articles, it didn't look too good. However, this is a start I guess? Mr. Magoo (talk) 00:32, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep seems to clearly meet WP:GEOLAND. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and snow close With new sources added, this clearly meets GNG. AbstractIllusions (talk) 13:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.