Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masjid-an-Noor, Newfoundland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 00:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Masjid-an-Noor, Newfoundland

 * –( ViewAfD Viewlog  NewfoundlandStats ):

Not a notable place of worship; not in any sense encyclopedically relevant.--NL19931993 (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Some editors might prefer more over-the-top statement of significance; I prefer under-stated.  This is the first and only mosque in the largest city in a Canadian province.  Maybe only one in the province; it is only member of Category:Mosques in Newfoundland and Labrador.  First mosque in Ohio, USA, and similar are all accepted.  Nice short article with sources and good photo. --Doncram (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note it is included in List of mosques in Canada, where it is asserted to be the only mosque in Newfoundland. By the way, I don't really understand the deletion nomination to mean anything more than "I don't like it";  perhaps it would be helpful to explain.  Has any wp:BEFORE been done?  There is no mention of having searched for sources and no assertion that sources present aren't fully adequate.  Also there is no way this should be outright deleted, because obviously redirect/merge would be superior to that, but at this point I think "Keep" is simply best. --Doncram (talk) 15:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per doncram. Notable mosque. Zindagi713 (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per my standards. Bearian (talk) 17:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Article already included RS coverage from the largest paper in the province and from the country's national broadcaster.  This is obvious evidence of notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.