Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maslach Burnout Inventory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  09:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Maslach Burnout Inventory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article only refers to the website affiliated with the creators of the theory; written by a declared COI editor; no confirmation that the theory has been independently supported. Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Added references to independent support of theory and instrument. Issa 23:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Issa at Mind Garden (talk • contribs)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - appears to pass the WP:GNG threshold. More than passing mentions in The NYT, Medscape, Forbes even calls it "the gold standard for diagnosing burnout among professionals", and there are other articles, including more in both Forbes and the NYT, as well as nice piece on the AMA website.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * keep per reasons given by Onel5969--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: I've added in four citations as examples of its use. Clearly notable. Bondegezou (talk) 13:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.