Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason (Company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Mason (Company)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Borderline G11 candidate, citations appear to be largely self-published (i.e. from Forbes contributors) or overly reliant on PR materials. I'm unsure of the reliability of any of the websites that have apparently given the company awards, but my strong suspicion is that it fails WP:GNG regardless.  always forever  (talk) 06:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Companies.  always forever  (talk)  06:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Karnataka and California.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment: The firm was previously known as Kubric so I am adding a further Find Sources below. AllyD (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article on a start-up firm. Some of the content relates to the individuals who established this firm, from whose prior or other roles notability is not inherited. Other content relates to funding announcements, which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH, and various industry awards which are non-notable (and one of which is from a partner company). As the nominator said, some content is rather promotional, e.g. "a self-serve no-code platform that powers Marketers, Product Managers, and Founders to upgrade their D2C storefronts from storytelling to selling to scaling". That aside, though, such coverage of the company as is available is interview-based; I don't see attained notability as being demonstrable at this point. AllyD (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.