Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason SBDC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Mason SBDC

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. Flagged for COI. No credible referenced independent assertion of notability; Google Books shows mostly directory references and two case studies of this organization as a preliminary screening Wtshymanski (talk) 14:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally, the wikipedia page for Mason SBDC does not seem to be particularly advertising anything. Also, considering the fact that other SBDC sites are also in wikipedia there is no reason to delete Mason SBDC.-- 12:28, 19 April 2011 Wow0928 (talk | contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 04:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment by nominator' I don't believe this organization passes the guidelines listed in WP:CORP and I have not found any significant reliable sources discussing this organization. --Wtshymanski (talk) 04:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete This Virginia-based non-profit does not appear to have attracted notice from newspapers or other reliable sources. There appear to be many SBDCs out there, and the "history" section of this article discusses the history of all those broadly, not just this one. If and when it is the subject of in-depth coverage from secondary sources, an article may be appropriate; at this point in time, however, deletion seems proper. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 10:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.