Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masroor International Cricket Tournament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Masroor International Cricket Tournament

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD has previously been contested. Tournament is a non-notable cricket tournament. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)]


 * Delete Not notable. The only sources given are YouTube, a press release, two pages on blogspot (the blog in question glorifies itself under the title "Ahmadiyya Times" and tries to look like a newspaper, but it is just a blogspot account), and a page promoting Masroor International Cricket Tournament on the web site of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Youth Association of the United Kingdom. No coverage at all in reliable third party sources. The article was clearly written as promotion, and although it has been toned down somewhat, it has done nothing to show notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:11, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep

Allegation that it is not notable

The wining of Canada in the 3rd tournament is also published on the offical website of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The videos are on Youtube have a Standarad Youtube license. You have said that there is no media coverage, here are proofs of media coverage The match of Germany VS Canada can be seen in these vidoes which are a recording of MTA 1. How can you after this say that there is no media coverage of this tournament. Please tell me that how will you recongize a article is notable?--Nokhaiz Kaunpal (talk) 14:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)'
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Nobody said "no media coverage". The closest, as far as I can see, is "No coverage at all in reliable third party sources". A few amateur videos posted on YouTube are not reliable third party sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No coverage in reliable sources. I recommend that User:Nokhaiz Kaunpal reads WP:RS - and WP:V for that matter. --Dweller (talk) 14:52, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Reading WP:N, WP:CITE and WP:TPG may also help. I moved and slightly refactored Nokhaiz Kaunpal's comment so the references are readable, I hope he won't mind. --Muhandes (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  —AssociateAffiliate (talk) 15:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacks coverage in reliable sources so fails WP:GNG. Mtking (talk) 07:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.