Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo Grassotti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Massimo Grassotti

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable amateur golfer who fails to meet the inclusion criteria at Athlete. PROD removed with the explanation "Please don't delete this page. I am a close relative of Massimo Grassotti, this is an amazing opportuity for my cousin. He's an amazing golfer. Please dont delete!", which somewhat misses the point. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Tewapack (talk) 19:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment He hasn't even played well enough as an amateur to have a World Amateur Golf Ranking, see rankings here. Tewapack (talk) 16:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons given above. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons given.- William 23:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The article says he had an "Appearance in french Golf Magazine (Referred to as "Swing de Pro")-2010". And someone scanned in the page from that magazine to prove it.  So not all sources out there are in English or even online to search from.   D r e a m Focus  12:24, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Still not notable however. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * We don't know that until someone searches in other languages, and even then you can't be certain what coverage they have had or not, since many reliable sources are not online and searchable. If the guy's cousin is watching the article, he can ask him if he has ever done interviews anywhere, and then let us know where to look.   D r e a m Focus  20:27, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, and I see that you have done that, but I think the article smacks of someone who might have potential but doesn't seem to have achieved very much yet and is probably not notable at this time. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Two references have now been added to the article, neither of which appear to be reliable sources. There is a lot of effort going on here to try to make the un-notable, notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - limited notability - not yet a professional, maybe later, but not right now. Off2riorob (talk) 16:19, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:ATH. LibStar (talk) 08:56, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.