Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massive Audio (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Cryptic 14:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Massive Audio
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

If not for that 2006 AfD, I would've PRODed, nothing here at all for actual substance and independent notability. SwisterTwister  talk  03:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

I understand the afD from 2006, but is been a long time ago (10 years) and now Massive Audio has exclusive partnership from two of the biggest and important series of all time (Star Trek and Doctor Who) to distributed exclusive fan products. User:Ejhonen talk  03:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane 2007  talk 02:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

If the article are adding to relisting two times, and no one says nothing about it. Can I request the keep of the article and closer of this AfD? User:Ejhonen talk  19:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * This can actually be relisted three times to help for better consensus especially since the current article is still not actually convincing and no improvements have been made to actually fix this. Also, two partnerships with notable companies is not establishing notability of its own for this company as there would still need to be thr needed substance. SwisterTwister   talk  21:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - I'm not seeing any good secondary sources at all, but I acknowledge I might not have found the right search terms yet. "Massive Audio" returns far too much, and adding the founder's name returns very little. I see a lot of primary sources/press releases. Notability is based on significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If you know of such coverage, you should link to it here, but note that this does not include brief mentions, press releases, material produced by organizations/people tied to the subject (e.g. BBC promoting a Doctor Who-related product), etc. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 21:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I searched for "Fametek" as well and was only able to find trivial and PR-like mentions. The article's tone is strongly promotional so I would advocate deletion based on WP:PROMO. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep -- Hi, =) you said this: "If not for that 2006 AfD, I would've PRODed" Why after 23 days  the article lost relevance? It's not only about the partnerships is about how huge this company is.  I wrote this article because there are companies that are less relevant than Massive Audio and have a wiki, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wand_Company If this company had a wiki and only had distributed in United Kingdom, why Massive Audio who distributed worldwide doesn't have to be on Wikipedia? I compared Massive Audio with a companies like these https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTX_Audio or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JL_Audio
 * This article is about Massive Audio, not Fametek. Fametek is just a division of the company.
 * I'm not able to find much for "Massive Audio" either. The company appears to be non-notable, per available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Now I have some doubts about the relisting process because I read these articles and says that things maybe can be different. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relisting_can_be_abusive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Relisting User:Ejhonen talk  18:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.