Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massive Monster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I am not satisfied that any valid contributions have made to this debate on the side of inclusion, and as such I am going with a consensus to delete. I note that if this company does grow and receive reliable coverage then it could be recreated in the future as it would have been WP:TOOSOON at this time. KaisaL (talk) 13:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Massive Monster

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not yet notable per WP:CORP, with no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. They won a developer competition run by Intel, but though that company is notable, the prize doesn't seem particularly notable and gets little coverage. I can't find any confirmation online of them winning an award from Game Jam, and the Casual Connect Indie Prize seems to be low-notability. OnionRing (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 14:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 14:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Does not appear to be a notable company. Too soon. AdrianGamer (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * There was a mistake with the awards, if you look on the Massive Monster Website it says 'UOP GameJam'. UOP meaning University of Portsmouth. Although that award shouldn't be on there I do not agree that this company page should be deleted due to the fact of awards, they are even listed on a gamedevmap. Content like this can help smaller games companies get more publicity and with 2 games on the brink of release there will be more content to put up soon. Please reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.66.84.246 (talk) 12:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * But Wikipedia isn't meant to be a vehicle to help promote companies who ought to be better known, it's an encyclopaedia for documenting things (and companies) that are already notable. How do you know that they have two games in the brink of release: do you work for the company? OnionRing (talk) 14:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Its games had next to no coverage in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. The awards are non-notable and didn't bring the company much press for us to use to write an article... And there are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar  17:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.