Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massive Monster Mayhem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Massive Monster Mayhem

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:TOOSOON and a lack notable sources supporting the topic's notability. Comatmebro (talk) 01:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Yes, as of now, this game show has no secondary press/media coverage. But that is not unusual for a kid's show like this that hasn't even premiered yet (it premieres at 8pm tonight). As it is, I have found a primary source for this, as well as the official webpage for the show, and have improved the article. With a scheduled release date on a national cable network, this currently meets the requirements of WP:TVSHOW. We can revisit this later, after the show has aired for a while, to see what the secondary coverage looks like. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I've now added a secondary Canadian source (not quite sure of the quality of the source) from about a week ago. But secondary coverage still looks scant... Still sticking with my current !vote. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep nationally broadcast and should receive some secondary coverage in the near future Atlantic306 (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Let this page stay. It is one of Nickelodon's latest game shows. Plus, the other users are right about their claims here. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.