Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massmutualasia Junior Astronauts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. RasputinAXP  c  03:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Massmutualasia Junior Astronauts
I believe this article is simply for promotional purposes and contains no value to stay inside the encyclopedia. It is only a list of participants of the event. Without the list of participants, there is merely no contents. It is also not an important event in Hong Kong, as the entry barrier is extremely high that only school kids from elite schools are eligible for the entrance. -- Tomchiukc 03:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Delete Please go to [1] for details. Appears to be advertising (per nom) and is a poor none notable article.-- A n d e h 06:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC) style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);"> Curtis talk+contributions 09:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep IF and only IF there's some context added and references added.  I agree it's just a list of participants right now, and that's neither interesting nor encyclopedic.  There's no indication where these kids come from, who's sponsoring the program (if it's an official government program, that's one thing, but if it's because they pulled some names out of a milk carton, eh), and what the goals of the program are.  The article makes no mention of Hong Kong, so I wonder where the nom is getting this from?  Also, the article is disputed for neutrality, but there's no reason given on the talk page.  Tychocat 05:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as proposal. michael <span
 * Delete per nom. Kevin 10:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. See for more info Jll 11:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete 6 kids who go to a space camp every year. While I'm sure that's fun, it's not really an encyclopedia article topic. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if expanded. Xyra  e  l  T 19:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.