Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Arcane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 01:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Master Arcane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:PROMO, doesn't meet GNG. The removed prod indicated that the subject didn't meet GNG as well. I've left the sources as they were, but they don't appear to be RS - there's blogs, Youtube videos, a poster(?), etc., but it's entirely possible that these are RS for the subculture. I find the article to be very WP:PROMO as well, and I'm not sure there'd be anything left of value if it was trimmed down. MSJapan (talk) 04:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches and examinations have still found nothing for convincing independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  21:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.