Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Yoda as a leader of nonviolent resistance

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE

Master Yoda as a leader of nonviolent resistance

 * Keep at least for a bit, I mean Master Yoda is a much more convincing charcter than Jesus, I mean Jesus is full of continuity errors, plus he's all flash, all in all, horrible novel, all in all I'm sure the Film adaptation was a lot better--172.166.227.71 20:18, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as utter, sockpuppet-supported bilgewater. Say the word and this is toast. - Lucky 6.9 21:40, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I rather resent the name calling, so I'm changing my origional vote to *double-keep* for the record that means I now out vote you 2:1, unless of course you want to change your vote to double-keep as well, in which case I'll be forced to change mine to a triple-keep, so it seems, you've lost--172.166.227.71 21:43, 13 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Ha, ha. I, on the other hand have the Magic Wiki Rollback Key.  Top that.  :) - Lucky 6.9 21:49, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't make a mockery of such a serious issue, or I may be forced to change my vote to triple-infinitie-keep --172.166.227.71 21:59, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * "Triple-infinitie-keep," eh? You wouldn't dare, knave. - Lucky 6.9 22:01, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * try me--172.166.227.71 22:22, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I have just one acronym for you all: BJAODN. Oh, yes, and Delete. Ken talk 22:26, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Rubbish this is. Delete we must. David | Talk 22:30, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Unless references are added before end of VfD, delete. JYolkowski // talk 23:02, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * This is pushing the nonsense threshold. Delete Soltak 23:28, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * which direction is it pushing it?--172.166.227.71 22:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nonsense. ManoaChild 00:07, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Both the article and the VfD gave me a much-needed laugh. Thus, 'BJAODN both the article and this debate. CanadianCaesar 00:08, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Definitely BJAODN this debate; delete the article. Jaxl | talk 00:55, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete we must. Capitalistroadster 01:09, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly. But you're the funniest anon I've seen around in ages! Get an account! -Splash 01:27, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Slac speak up!  01:28, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: What Splash said.  Still look as good in 900 years, this will! - Lucky 6.9 05:46, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absurd crap.--Kross 01:22, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. I put the original speedy request on this page for reason of patent nonsense when it was first created and I stand by that. There isn't anything here to justify a VFD in my opinion. 23skidoo 02:27, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, but please keep this VfD archived somewhere :p --Raistlin 14:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.