Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master david

Master david was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

An obvious vanity delete, though it doesn't qualify for speedy under WP:CSD. Fire away. &bull; Benc &bull; 22:08, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete But why not a speedy under point 4 'Very short articles with little or no context' and arguably point 1 'No meaningful content or history'? Jongarrettuk 22:16, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is so illeterate gibberish it certainly conforms to "no meaningful content or history". jni 06:07, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, preferably speedily. IMHO all articles containing the words "gamefaq" and "pwnage" should be shot on sight. --Ianb 06:10, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Speddy delete.--MaxMad 13:04, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Not only vanity but vanity that is being actively vandalized by another anon IP since the VfD tag was added. Obvious delete.  It would be a stretch (though, admittedly, a very short stretch) to speedy.  Rossami 21:13, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity, nigh-nonsense.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 01:52, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I didn't have any trouble stretching this. It was a prank.  Pranks are speedy delete candidates.  It's gone. Geogre 21:19, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.