Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master volume controls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 13:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Master volume controls

 * Delete/Merge Non-Encyclopedic...I probably could have Speedied it, but maybe we should merge it somewhere? (Postscript: Maybe we could clean it up...) Ø  tVaughn05 talkcontribs 19:46, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

I'd be happy to "clean it up". 204.86.231.10 23:28, 26 January 2006 Drbob1a(UTC)
 * Delete for the moment, Wikipedia is not a how-to. Stifle 09:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC) It's better, but not best. Weak delete still. Stifle 16:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Edited I have now edited the article to remove the second person pronoun, and to tighten up the language. I'm not sure what you mean about "Wikipedia is not a how-to"? Please check the edited version and see if it meets your standards. Drbob1a

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Deathphoenix' 22:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unencylopaedic in tone, and fails to mention whether the control in question goes up to eleven. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 22:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, and it's not a potentiometer, it's a potential divider.
 * And anyway, sound engineers call them faders. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 16:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.