Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Match Premier Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 07:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Match Premier Cup

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lots of countries have pre-season friendly tournaments&mdash;which are of no consequence or significance. This tournament is open for four Russian clubs. To write that the clubs "claim titles" from this tournament is probably an exaggeration. Media coverage exists, as with any soccer game, but not significant coverage of the tournament. Geschichte (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  07:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment If it's sourced, then that adds some notability, however I don't see notability outside of Russia. This seems like one of those articles okay for Russian wikipedia, but I am not sure it's notable enough for the English. Govvy (talk) 10:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - loads of pre-season friendly 'tournaments' out there, no evidence this is notable enough for an article. GiantSnowman 15:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - most of the coverage is routine and from primary sources (I am counting Match TV, the sponsor of the tournament, as a primary source); I saw nothing more than routine/trivial coverage from independent sources in a search Spiderone  12:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.