Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matching person and technology model


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  04:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Matching person and technology model

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability and quality issues. The article was created by a single-purpose account in 2009. None of the content is sourced, the "general" references are generally about "assistive technology" or are by MJ Scherer, the creator of this model. Google Scholar has about 3 results not associated with Scherer, which use this as background.

None of the current content should be merged to assistive technology, so I have not unilaterally redirected the article. However, if there is sourced content to include there, I am not opposed to that redirect. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability and Technology.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.