Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Material explorer

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:06, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)

Material explorer
This appears to be original research. Both links in the external links section fail the Alexa Test with "No Data Available" at all. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 22:30, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Totally incomprehensible. Not notable. Smoddy | &epsilon;&iota;&pi;&epsilon;&tau;&epsilon; 22:42, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original non-notable incomprehensible research. --Idont Havaname 23:57, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mikkalai 08:14, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article has potential. External links have been updated meeting the Alexa Test. Material Explorer &theory will be notable soon, though if no result in 2months, move it to wikifnfo (original research).vanbezooyen 12:06, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable and rather hard to understand. Articles about student projects should not be kept on the merit of the student in question claiming the subject will be notable soon. Move to wikinfo or user page straight away. If vanbezooyen's claims about future notability turns out to be true (and I do wish him good luck), the article can be recreated. Alarm 14:42, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Move. ok. good point Alarm, I'll put a request for moving the page to wikinfo for now.vanbezooyen 17:02, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Adv. Gtabary 10:46, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.